Technique Guide · Path-iQ Global Pathology Review

Immunohistochemistry in Pathology
The Complete IHC Guide 2026

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most widely used ancillary technique in diagnostic pathology — applied to classify tumours, detect infectious organisms, quantify prognostic biomarkers, and guide targeted therapy selection. Understanding IHC principles, antibody selection, and result interpretation is essential for every practicing pathologist.

Updated 30 July 2026 · Path-iQ Editorial · About Path-iQ →

How IHC Works — Principles

IHC detects specific proteins (antigens) within tissue sections using antibodies. The fundamental steps are: (1) antigen retrieval — reverses formalin-induced crosslinks that mask epitopes; (2) primary antibody incubation — the antibody binds its specific target antigen; (3) secondary detection — an enzyme-linked or polymer-based secondary system amplifies the signal; (4) chromogen development — the enzyme reacts with a substrate to produce a coloured precipitate (DAB = brown, AP-Red = red) at the antigen site; (5) counterstaining — haematoxylin provides blue nuclear background contrast.

Two antigen retrieval methods exist: heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using buffer at high temperature (pressure cooker, microwave, or water bath at pH 6.0 citrate or pH 9.0 EDTA) is used for most antigens; protease-induced epitope retrieval (PIER) with proteinase K or trypsin is used for a small number of antigens (e.g., some collagen-based targets). Automated platforms (Leica BOND, Ventana BenchMark, Dako Autostainer) have standardised HIER protocols, improving inter-laboratory reproducibility.

Essential IHC Panels — Tumour Classification

Undifferentiated Malignant Neoplasm — First-Line Panel

MarkerLineagePositive Result SuggestsClone / Notes
AE1/AE3 + CAM5.2Epithelial (broad cytokeratin)Carcinoma (most types); mesothelioma; some sarcomas (synovial, epithelioid)Pan-CK cocktail; negative in most sarcomas and lymphomas
CD45 (LCA)HaematopoieticLymphoma, leukaemia (excludes most carcinomas and sarcomas)2B11+PD7/26; rarely lost in ALCL and plasma cell myeloma
S100Melanocytic, neural, myoepithelialMelanoma, nerve sheath tumours, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, myoepitheliomaPolyclonal; broad; always combine with more specific marker (SOX10, HMB-45, MelanA)
VimentinMesenchymalSarcoma, melanoma, lymphoma, renal cell carcinomaBroad — positive in most poorly differentiated tumours; low specificity alone
SOX10Neural crest / melanocyticMelanoma (nuclear), nerve sheath tumours (schwannoma, MPNST), myoepithelial tumoursMore specific than S100 for melanocytic lineage; negative in carcinoma
CD34Endothelial, stromal, progenitorVascular tumours (angiosarcoma), GIST, DFSP, solitary fibrous tumour, haematopoietic progenitorsClone QBEnd-10; also marks dermal dendrocytes

Carcinoma — Subtyping Panel

MarkerPositive InKey NegativePrimary Use
TTF-1 (NKX2-1)Lung adenocarcinoma (~75%); thyroid carcinoma; SCLCSquamous cell carcinoma of lung; GI, breast, GU carcinomasDistinguish lung adeno (TTF-1+) from SCC (p40+) in lung biopsy; thyroid origin
p40 (ΔNp63)Squamous cell carcinoma (lung, H&N, oesophagus, cervix); urothelial carcinoma; basal cellAdenocarcinoma; SCLC; neuroendocrine tumoursMost specific SCC marker; superior to p63 for this purpose
Napsin ALung adenocarcinoma (~80%); renal clear cell and papillary RCCSquamous, SCLC, mesotheliomaCombined with TTF-1 for lung adeno; strong cytoplasmic granular staining
CDX2Colorectal adenocarcinoma (~90%); gastric intestinal-type; appendiceal; small bowelLung, breast, gynaecological carcinomas (usually negative)GI origin marker; nuclear; strongest expression in CRC
GATA3Breast carcinoma; urothelial carcinoma; paraganglioma; trophoblastic tumoursLung, GI, prostate (usually negative)Distinguish breast from other adenocarcinomas; urothelial origin in metastases
PAX8Renal carcinoma; ovarian (serous, clear cell, endometrioid); thyroid; Müllerian tumoursBreast, lung, GI (usually negative)Gynaecological and renal origin marker; nuclear
PSA / NKX3.1Prostate adenocarcinoma (highly specific)Most other carcinomasPSA less sensitive in high-grade; NKX3.1 more sensitive for high-grade prostate Ca
WT1Mesothelioma; serous ovarian carcinoma; Wilms tumour; desmoplastic small round cell tumourAdenocarcinoma (usually negative); urothelial (negative)Nuclear WT1: mesothelioma vs adenocarcinoma panel
CalretininMesothelioma; adrenal cortical tumour; sex cord-stromal tumours; ganglion cellsAdenocarcinoma of lung, breast, GIMesothelioma panel (calretinin + WT1 + D2-40 vs CEA + MOC31 for adeno)
Synaptophysin / Chromogranin ANeuroendocrine tumours (carcinoid, SCLC, Merkel, pancreatic NET, phaeochromocytoma)Adenocarcinoma; squamous carcinomaCore NE markers; Syn more sensitive, CgA more specific; SCLC: Syn+CgA+TTF-1

Lymphoma Panel — Differentiation

MarkerLineage / EntityPatternClinical Use
CD20B-cell lymphoma (mature)MembranousDLBCL, FL, MCL, MZL, CLL/SLL; rituximab therapy target
PAX5B-cell lineage (broad)Nuclear (weak in plasma cells)B-cell confirmation including CHL Reed-Sternberg cells (weak/focal PAX5)
CD3T-cell lineageMembranous / cytoplasmicT-cell lymphoma; distinguish T from B in nodal biopsy
CD10Germinal centre B-cellsMembranousFL (CD10+BCL6+BCL2+); GCB-DLBCL; Burkitt (CD10+ MYC+)
BCL2Follicular lymphoma (strong); GCB DLBCL (weak/mod)CytoplasmicFL: CD10+BCL6+BCL2+ strong; BCL2 strong in non-GCB DLBCL
BCL6Germinal centre originNuclearFL; GCB-DLBCL; combined with CD10/MUM1 for Hans COO algorithm
MUM1 (IRF4)Post-GC / plasma cell differentiationNuclearNon-GCB DLBCL (Hans algorithm); plasma cell neoplasms; MALT lymphoma
Cyclin D1Mantle cell lymphoma (CCND1-IGH)NuclearMCL diagnostic; also hairy cell leukaemia; rare plasma cell myeloma
CD30ALCL; CHL; primary cutaneous CD30+ LPDMembranous / GolgiALCL (CD30+ALK±); CHL (CD30+CD15+PAX5 weak); brentuximab vedotin target
ALK (D5F3)ALK-positive ALCL; inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour; ALK+ NSCLCCytoplasmic ± nuclear (pattern varies by fusion)ALK+ ALCL: best prognosis PTCL; ALK TKI therapy (crizotinib, alectinib) in NSCLC
Ki-67 (MIB1)All proliferating cellsNuclearProliferation index: Burkitt ~100%; DLBCL 40–90%; FL varies; NET grading (G1 <3%, G2 3–20%, G3 >20%)

Prognostic & Predictive IHC Biomarkers

BiomarkerTumourTestScoring SystemClinical Impact
ER / PR (oestrogen/progesterone receptor)Breast carcinomaIHC (SP1/1E2 for ER; 1E2 for PR)Allred score (0–8) or H-score (0–300); positive = ≥1% nuclear staining (ASCO/CAP 2020)Hormone therapy (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors) eligibility; strongest predictor of endocrine therapy response
HER2Breast; gastric; GEJ; CRC; endometrialIHC (4B5; SP3; CB11) → ISH if 2+0 / 1+ / 2+ / 3+ (ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines); 3+ or ISH-amplified = positiveAnti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1, T-DXd); HER2-low (1+ or 2+/ISH-): T-DXd eligibility
PD-L1NSCLC; TNBC; gastric; cervical; urothelial; H&N SCC; many othersIHC (22C3; 28-8; SP142; SP263 — clone-specific)TPS (tumour proportion score) for most; CPS (combined positive score) for gastric/urothelial; IC% for atezolizumabCheckpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab) eligibility and dose selection
MLH1 / MSH2 / MSH6 / PMS2CRC; endometrial; other Lynch-associated tumoursIHC panel (4 markers simultaneously)Nuclear loss = abnormal (dMMR); intact nuclear expression = MMR-proficientMSI-H/dMMR → pembrolizumab; Lynch syndrome reflex testing (MLH1 loss → BRAF V600E to exclude sporadic); adjuvant chemotherapy guidance in stage II CRC
p53Endometrial; ovarian; breast; CRC; many othersIHC (DO-7)Aberrant pattern: overexpression (>80% strong nuclear) OR complete absence (null pattern) = TP53 mutationEndometrial carcinoma molecular subgroup (p53-abnormal = worst prognosis); ovarian serous carcinoma signature (p53+ >96%)
Ki-67Breast; neuroendocrine tumours; lymphomaIHC (MIB1; SP6)% positive nuclei in hot-spot or global counting; NET: G1 <3%, G2 3–20%, G3 >20%Breast: Oncotype DX proliferation score correlation; NET grading (ENETS/WHO); DLBCL proliferation assessment
IDH1 R132HGlioma (IDH-mutant)IHC (clone H09)Any cytoplasmic positivity in tumour cells = positive (very high specificity for R132H)Confirms IDH-mutant glioma class; negative in ~10% of IDH-mutant gliomas (non-R132H — need sequencing)
ATRXIDH-mutant astrocytomaIHC (polyclonal)Nuclear loss in tumour cells (internal positive control: endothelial cells must retain staining)Loss supports astrocytoma lineage over oligodendroglioma; combined with IDH and 1p/19q FISH for integrated glioma diagnosis

IHC Quality Assurance — NordiQC & CAP Proficiency

External quality assurance (EQA) is mandatory for all IHC biomarkers used in clinical decision-making. The two largest IHC EQA programmes are:

The most common sources of IHC failure identified by NordiQC assessments: insufficient antigen retrieval (most frequent for ER, PR, Ki-67); inappropriate antibody dilution; use of non-validated antibody clones; suboptimal fixation (under- or over-fixation); and scanner/digital pathology colour calibration issues affecting quantitative IHC scoring.

Common IHC Pitfalls

PitfallMechanismExampleAvoidance
False-negative due to over-fixationExcessive formalin crosslinking masks epitopes despite antigen retrievalER negative in breast biopsy fixed >72h; HER2 1+ instead of 3+Fix 6–72h; document fixation time on request form; cold ischaemia <1h
False-negative due to under-fixationEpitopes diffuse or degrade; antigen retrieval may damage fragile proteinsER weakly positive in unfixed frozen section converted to FFPEImmerse in formalin immediately at specimen cut-up; 10% NBF preferred
Edge artefactAntibody/reagent pooling at biopsy edges causes intense non-specific stainingPD-L1 appearing strongly positive at core biopsy edges onlyInterpret central tumour cells only; disregard edge staining for scoring
Crush artefactMechanical pressure destroys cell architecture; IHC staining uninterpretableSCLC bronchial biopsy — neuroendocrine markers uninterpretableGentle tissue handling; touch prep/smear as backup; adequate core size
Non-specific backgroundEndogenous biotin, peroxidase, or protein binding; inadequate blockingLiver biopsy: endogenous biotin creates false-positive background with avidin-biotin systemsUse polymer-based detection (non-biotin) for liver; block endogenous peroxidase
Wrong clone for CDx applicationDifferent PD-L1 clones not interchangeable; validated clone required per drugUsing SP142 result to determine pembrolizumab eligibility (requires 22C3)Strict CDx-analyte mapping; one system per therapeutic agent
HER2 equivocal 2+ not reflexed to ISHIHC 2+ is uninformative without ISH confirmationTreating HER2 IHC 2+ as positive without ISH — 75% of 2+ cases are ISH-negativeReflex all IHC 2+ cases to FISH/CISH/DISH; never treat on 2+ IHC alone

Leading IHC Scientists & Pathologists — Global 2026

Mogens Vyberg
IHC Standardisation & NordiQC
Aalborg University, Denmark

Founder of NordiQC — the world's largest IHC external quality assurance programme. Internationally recognised as the leading authority on IHC standardisation, antibody validation, and the consequences of IHC variability in clinical pathology.

Allen M. Gown
Antibody Development & Tumour IHC
PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle

Pioneer in diagnostic antibody development for pathology. Developed many clinically essential antibody clones including anti-ER (SP1), anti-PR (1E2), anti-HER2 (4B5), and anti-p63 (4A4). Founder of Biocare Medical.

David J. Dabbs
Breast Pathology IHC
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Editor of Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry — the leading IHC reference text in anatomic pathology. Expert in breast biomarker IHC, ER/PR/HER2 testing standardisation, and the ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline development.

Lawrence True
Urological IHC & Prostate Pathology
University of Washington

Expert in IHC for prostate pathology, including AMACR (P504S), p63, and CK5/6 in prostate cancer versus benign mimics. Contributor to CAP prostate cancer reporting protocols and IHC quality standards.

Fabio Facchetti
Lymphoma & Haematopoietic IHC
University of Brescia, Italy

Authority on IHC in haematopoietic tumour pathology, including plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), blastic NK-cell lymphoma, and the use of novel IHC markers in haematopathology classification.

Clive Taylor
IHC History & Standardisation
University of Southern California

Pioneer who helped establish IHC as a routine diagnostic tool in the 1970s–80s. Champion of IHC standardisation and co-author of seminal work on the sources of IHC variability and pre-analytical factors.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does IHC take in a pathology laboratory?
Automated IHC staining runs take 3–6 hours on most platforms (Ventana BenchMark, Leica BOND, Dako Autostainer). Including tissue processing, sectioning, and pathologist interpretation, results are typically available within 1–3 business days after tissue receipt for routine IHC panels. Expedited protocols for intraoperative IHC (e.g., sentinel node cytokeratin for micrometastasis) can deliver results in 30–45 minutes using rapid IHC protocols on fresh-frozen tissue.
What is the difference between IHC and ISH (in situ hybridisation)?
IHC detects proteins using antibodies; ISH detects nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) using complementary nucleotide probes. IHC is faster, less expensive, and widely automated — it is the first-line technique for most biomarkers. ISH is used when gene copy number or rearrangement status is needed (HER2 FISH for amplification; ALK FISH for rearrangement; EBER ISH for EBV; CISH for HPV). RNA ISH (RNAscope) is an emerging technique that detects specific mRNA transcripts with single-molecule sensitivity and is particularly useful for ALK, ROS1, and NTRK fusion detection when antibody IHC is equivocal.
Why do some IHC antibodies require FISH confirmation?
Some proteins detected by IHC do not have a direct linear relationship with gene amplification or rearrangement. HER2 IHC 2+ (equivocal) cannot distinguish amplified from non-amplified cases — approximately 25% of 2+ cases are ISH-amplified and 75% are not — so reflex FISH is mandatory for all 2+ cases. ALK IHC (D5F3 clone, Ventana) has high sensitivity and specificity for ALK rearrangement and is used as a standalone CDx in some guidelines, but FISH or NGS is still preferred in ambiguous cases. PD-L1 IHC is used directly without ISH confirmation because the therapeutic biomarker is protein expression, not gene amplification.

Related Specialty Guides