Specialty Guide · Path-iQ Global Pathology Review

Renal Pathology
The Complete Guide 2026

Renal pathology encompasses kidney biopsy interpretation for medical renal diseases, renal tumour pathology for surgical specimens, and transplant kidney pathology. It is among the most protocol-driven and classification-intensive subspecialties in pathology — the Banff Classification, Oxford MEST-C score, and ISN/RPS lupus nephritis classification each govern distinct diagnostic domains.

Updated 30 July 2026 · Path-iQ Editorial · About Path-iQ →

Medical Renal Biopsy — Adequacy and Processing

A diagnostic renal biopsy requires: light microscopy (H&E, PAS, Jones methenamine silver, Masson trichrome — the four essential stains); immunofluorescence (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, kappa, lambda — performed on fresh-frozen tissue); and electron microscopy (glutaraldehyde-fixed, for ultrastructural assessment of immune complex deposits, basement membrane abnormalities, and podocyte foot process fusion). At least 10 glomeruli for IF and 10 for LM are required for adequate assessment; fewer glomeruli may be acceptable in selected clinical contexts.

The Four Essential LM Stains

Glomerulonephritis Classification

DiseaseLM PatternIF PatternEM DepositsClinical Presentation
IgA nephropathyMesangial hypercellularity; segmental sclerosis; crescents in severe casesDominant/codominant IgA mesangial; ± C3, IgG, IgMMesangial electron-dense depositsHaematuria ± proteinuria; often post-URI; most common primary GN worldwide
Membranous nephropathy (MN)GBM thickening; subepithelial "spikes" on JMS; no hypercellularityGranular IgG + C3 along GBM (capillary wall)Subepithelial electron-dense deposits; basement membrane material between deposits ("spikes")Nephrotic syndrome; PLA2R antibody in ~70–80% primary MN
Minimal change disease (MCD)Normal LM (hence "minimal change")Negative or trace non-specificDiffuse podocyte foot process effacement (>80%); no immune depositsNephrotic syndrome; most common NS in children; steroid-responsive
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)Segmental sclerosis involving portion of glomerulus; hyalinosis; foam cellsSegmental IgM and C3 (non-specific, trapped); negative IF in primary FSGSPodocyte foot process effacement (>50% in primary); no immune depositsNephrotic syndrome; APOL1 risk variants in African ancestry; primary vs secondary distinction crucial
Membranoproliferative GN (MPGN)Mesangial and endocapillary hypercellularity; GBM "tram-tracking" (double contour) on JMSImmune-complex type: IgG+C3; C3 glomerulopathy: C3 only (dominant)Subendothelial deposits (type 1); dense deposits within GBM (C3 glomerulopathy/type 2)Mixed nephritic-nephrotic; hypocomplementaemia; HCV-associated in immune-complex type
Anti-GBM disease (Goodpasture)Crescentic GN (fibrous or cellular crescents); fibrinoid necrosisLinear IgG along GBM (pathognomonic)No immune deposits; fibrin in Bowman's spaceRapidly progressive GN ± pulmonary haemorrhage; anti-GBM antibody positive
ANCA-associated GN (pauci-immune)Focal necrotising crescentic GN; fibrinoid necrosis; no significant immune depositsNegative or trace (pauci-immune — hallmark)No immune deposits; fibrin; segmental GBM disruptionRapidly progressive GN; ANCA positive (PR3 in GPA; MPO in MPA)
Lupus nephritis (ISN/RPS)Class I–VI (see below); proliferative or membranous patterns"Full house" IF: IgG+IgA+IgM+C3+C1q (C1q positivity suggests lupus)Subendothelial, mesangial, subepithelial deposits; "fingerprinting" in some casesProteinuria/haematuria in SLE; anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies; Class III/IV most severe
Diabetic nephropathyDiffuse mesangial expansion (most common); nodular glomerulosclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules); exudative lesions; GBM thickeningLinear IgG and albumin along GBM (non-specific trapping; not immune complex)GBM thickening; mesangial matrix expansion; no immune depositsMicroalbuminuria → macroalbuminuria; concurrent diabetic retinopathy in 90%; CKD progression

Oxford MEST-C Score — IgA Nephropathy

The Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy (2009, revised 2016 with C score) provides reproducible histological scoring with independent prognostic value for renal outcome. All five MEST-C features are scored on the initial diagnostic biopsy.

FeatureScoreDefinitionPrognostic Impact
Mesangial hypercellularity (M)M0 / M1M0: ≤50% glomeruli with >3 mesangial cells; M1: >50%M1 associated with worse renal survival; predicts benefit from immunosuppression
Endocapillary hypercellularity (E)E0 / E1E1: any glomerulus with endocapillary cells causing luminal narrowingE1 associated with worse short-term outcome; responds to immunosuppression
Segmental sclerosis / adhesion (S)S0 / S1S1: any glomerulus with segmental sclerosis or adhesion to Bowman's capsuleStrongest predictor of renal function decline; associated with proteinuria
Tubular atrophy / interstitial fibrosis (T)T0 / T1 / T2T0: <25%; T1: 25–50%; T2: >50% of cortical area affectedStrongest predictor of long-term renal survival; reflects cumulative chronicity
Crescents (C)C0 / C1 / C2C0: none; C1: <25% glomeruli; C2: ≥25% glomeruli with cellular or fibrocellular crescentsC2 associated with rapidly declining function; indication for intensified immunosuppression

Renal Cell Carcinoma — WHO 2022 Classification

SubtypeFrequencyHistologyKey GeneticsIHC
Clear cell RCC (ccRCC)~75%Clear cytoplasm; thin-walled "chicken-wire" vasculature; ISUP nucleolar grade 1–4VHL inactivation (90%); 3p25 deletion; PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1 mutationsCA9+, RCC+, CD10+, PAX8+, vimentin+; CK7−
Papillary RCC (pRCC)~15%Papillary or tubular-papillary architecture; foamy macrophages; haemosiderin; type 1 (basophilic small cells) vs type 2 (eosinophilic large cells)MET amplification/mutation (type 1); CDKN2A del, TFE3 fusion (some type 2)CK7+, AMACR (P504S)+, RCC+, PAX8+; CA9−
Chromophobe RCC (chRCC)~5%Large cells with prominent cell membranes; "raisinoid" nuclei; pale eosinophilic or mixed cytoplasm; Hale's colloidal iron positiveMultiple chromosome losses (1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, 21); TP53, PTEN mutationsCK7+++ (diffuse strong), CD117+, Hale's colloidal iron+; CA9−, vimentin−
Collecting duct carcinoma<1%Tubular/tubulopapillary; desmoplastic stroma; hobnail cells; originates in medullaFrequent SMARCB1 loss; complex genomicsCK7+, CK19+, Ulex+; PAX8+; SMARCB1 loss
MiT family translocation RCC~1–5% (under-recognised in adults)Papillary or nested; clear or eosinophilic cells; psammoma bodies; biphasic morphology in someTFE3 or TFEB translocation; Xp11 (TFE3) most commonTFE3 nuclear IHC (Xp11 RCC); TFEB (6p21 RCC); FISH confirmation recommended
Oncocytoma~5% of renal tumoursNests/tubules of eosinophilic cells; round nuclei; no necrosis; central scar common; BENIGNCCND1 rearrangements; mitochondrial alterations; no VHL mutationCK7 negative or focal; CD117+; vimentin−; distinguish from chRCC (Hale's colloidal iron pattern)

Transplant Kidney — Banff Classification 2022

The Banff Classification of renal allograft pathology (updated 2022) provides a universal framework for reporting kidney transplant biopsies. Protocol biopsies (at fixed time points post-transplant) and indication biopsies (for rising creatinine, proteinuria, or acute dysfunction) are interpreted using Banff lesion scores.

Banff CategoryDefinitionKey LesionsManagement Implication
1 — Normal / non-specific changesNo rejection; non-specific changes below diagnostic thresholdSurveillance; optimise immunosuppression
2 — Antibody-mediated changes (ABMR)Active or chronic active ABMR; microvascular injury + DSA evidenceGlomerulitis (g), peritubular capillaritis (ptc), C4d (may be negative in ABMR); DSA positiveIVIG, plasmapheresis, rituximab, bortezomib protocols
3 — Suspicious for T cell-mediated rejectionBorderline changes; tubulitis with minimal interstitial infiltratet1 tubulitis; i0–i1 infiltrate; insufficient for TCMR diagnosisClinical correlation; consider pulse steroids; drug levels
4 — T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR)Acute TCMR grade I–III or chronic active TCMRInterstitial infiltrate (i2–i3) + tubulitis (t2–t3) = IA/IB; intimal arteritis (v1–v3) = II/IIIIV methylprednisolone pulse; antithymocyte globulin for steroid-resistant; refractory → retransplant evaluation
5 — Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA)Chronic allograft injury without evidence of active rejectionci + ct scores (1–3); Banff 1a/1b if +inflammationOptimise CNI minimisation; evaluate calcineurin inhibitor toxicity; screen for recurrent disease
6 — OtherNon-rejection diagnoses: recurrent disease, de novo disease, drug toxicity, viral nephropathyBK virus (SV40 T-antigen IHC); CMV inclusions; calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (isometric vacuolisation); recurrent IgA, FSGSAntiviral therapy; drug adjustment; treat recurrent disease

Leading Renal Pathologists — Global 2026

Agnes Fogo
Medical Renal Pathology & Glomerular Disease
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

President of the International Society of Nephrology and world authority on glomerulonephritis, FSGS pathogenesis, and the pathology of diabetic nephropathy. Editor of Fundamentals of Renal Pathology.

Sanjeev Sethi
IgA Nephropathy & Complement-Mediated GN
Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Authority on IgA nephropathy (Oxford classification), C3 glomerulopathy, and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease. Leads Mayo Clinic's renal pathology consultation service — one of the largest in the world.

Lorraine Racusen
Transplant Renal Pathology & Banff Classification
Johns Hopkins University

A founding contributor to the Banff Classification of renal allograft pathology. Expert in antibody-mediated rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, and the pathological basis of transplant outcome prediction.

Kiril Trpkov
Renal Tumour Pathology
University of Calgary, Alberta

International authority on renal tumour classification; described several novel renal tumour entities now incorporated into the WHO 2022 classification including MTSCC, papillary RCC with reversed polarity, and emerging molecular RCC subtypes.

Tibor Nadasdy
Renal Transplant & Vascular Pathology
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Expert in renal allograft pathology, thrombotic microangiopathy in renal biopsies, and the pathology of renal vascular diseases. Major contributor to the Banff working group on ABMR classification.

Mark Haas
ABMR & Complement Pathology
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles

Leading authority on antibody-mediated rejection, C4d scoring in transplant biopsies, and the Banff 2022 revision of ABMR criteria. Expert on the role of donor-specific antibodies in chronic allograft injury.

Frequently Asked Questions

When should a kidney biopsy be performed?
Kidney biopsy is indicated when the diagnosis cannot be established from clinical and laboratory data alone and the result will change management. Common indications: unexplained nephrotic syndrome in adults (MCD vs FSGS vs MN cannot be distinguished without biopsy); unexplained rapidly progressive GN (AKI + urine sediment suggesting glomerular origin); unexplained proteinuria exceeding 1g/24h without clear clinical diagnosis; monitoring of lupus nephritis class and disease activity; evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction; and diagnosis of hereditary nephropathy in younger patients. The main contraindications are uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, a single functioning kidney (relative), and severe uncontrolled hypertension.
What is the difference between FSGS and MCD?
Both minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) present with nephrotic syndrome and show podocyte foot process effacement on EM. The key distinction is on LM: MCD shows normal glomerular architecture on light microscopy, while FSGS shows segmental sclerosis in at least one glomerulus. This means FSGS can be missed if few glomeruli are sampled (sampling error) — a seemingly "normal" biopsy in a nephrotic patient who fails steroid treatment may be FSGS with inadequate sampling. Clinically, MCD is almost universally steroid-responsive while primary FSGS has a steroid response rate of ~30–40%.
What does PLA2R mean in a membranous nephropathy report?
PLA2R (phospholipase A2 receptor) is the target antigen in approximately 70–80% of primary (idiopathic) membranous nephropathy cases. Anti-PLA2R antibodies are produced by the immune system and deposit in a granular subepithelial pattern along the glomerular basement membrane, visible on IHC or immunofluorescence. A positive PLA2R staining strongly supports a primary (autoimmune) aetiology for MN, while PLA2R-negative MN raises the possibility of secondary causes (malignancy, HBV, lupus, drugs). Serum anti-PLA2R titre correlates with disease activity and can be used to monitor response to rituximab and other immunosuppressive therapies.

Related Specialty Guides