Specialty Guide · Path-iQ Global Pathology Review

Lymphoma Pathology
The Complete Guide 2026

The WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th edition, 2022) restructured lymphoma classification around integrated morphological, immunophenotypic, genetic, and clinical data — recognising over 80 distinct lymphoid and histiocytic neoplasms. Accurate lymphoma diagnosis requires core biopsy or excision biopsy (not FNA alone), expert haematopathology interpretation, and close integration with flow cytometry, FISH, and molecular data.

Updated 30 July 2026 · Path-iQ Editorial · About Path-iQ →

Biopsy Requirements — Why FNA Is Usually Insufficient

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of a lymph node yields single cells and small clusters — insufficient to assess the nodal architecture, which is critical for lymphoma classification. Exceptions where FNA may be diagnostic: CLL/SLL (flow cytometry on peripheral blood usually sufficient); highly characteristic metastatic carcinoma to lymph node; relapsed/refractory lymphoma where prior diagnosis is known and only cell viability for flow cytometry is needed. For a new lymphoma diagnosis, an excision biopsy of the entire node is ideal. Where surgery carries risk, a minimum 18-gauge core needle biopsy (3–5 cores) with simultaneous material submitted for: (1) formalin fixation for FFPE histology, (2) fresh tissue for flow cytometry, (3) snap-frozen for cytogenetics/FISH, and (4) RPMI for cell culture if lymphoblastic lymphoma suspected.

WHO 2022 — Major B-cell Lymphoma Entities

LymphomaKey HistologyIHC ProfileGeneticsClinical Notes
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS (DLBCL-NOS)Large cells in diffuse pattern; centroblastic (most) or immunoblastic (worse prognosis) variantsCD20+, PAX5+, CD79a+, BCL6±, CD10±, MUM1±; Ki-67 >40% (usually 60–90%)BCL6 rearrangements (~30%); BCL2 rearrangement (~20%); MYC rearrangement single-hit; COO: GCB vs non-GCB (Hans algorithm)R-CHOP standard (GCB); polatuzumab vedotin + R-CHP for high-risk (POLARIX trial); double-hit/triple-hit → R-EPOCH
High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (HGBL-MYC/BCL2) — "Double-hit lymphoma"Morphologically DLBCL or intermediate DLBCL/BL; high Ki-67; starry-sky may be presentCD20+, BCL2+++ (strong in most), MYC IHC ≥40% of cells; Ki-67 ≥80%MYC + BCL2 dual FISH rearrangement — MANDATORY dual FISH when MYC IHC ≥40% in GCB-DLBCL; BCL2 t(14;18) + MYC translocationR-CHOP insufficient; R-EPOCH or DA-EPOCH-R preferred; intensified consolidation or auto-SCT; CAR-T in relapse
Follicular lymphoma (FL)Follicular architecture (at least partially); centrocytes (cleaved cells) + centroblasts; grading 1–2 (indolent) vs grade 3A vs grade 3B (aggressive)CD20+, CD10+, BCL6+, BCL2+++ (strong; germinal centre cells normally BCL2−), CD5−, Cyclin D1−; Ki-67 <20% (grade 1–2)t(14;18)(q32;q21) → IGH-BCL2 fusion in ~90% grade 1–3A; BCL2 FISH; grade 3B often BCL2-negative, t(14;18)-negativeGrade 1–2: watch-and-wait if asymptomatic; R-bendamustine or R-CHOP for treatment-requiring; obinutuzumab-based regimens; grade 3B: treat as DLBCL
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)Monomorphic small-to-medium lymphoid cells; mantle zone, diffuse, nodular, or blastoid (worst) patterns; hyalinised blood vesselsCD20+, CD5+, Cyclin D1+ (nuclear, pathognomonic), SOX11+, CD10−, BCL6−; FMC7+; CD23−t(11;14)(q13;q32) → CCND1-IGH; IGHV unmutated (aggressive) vs mutated (indolent "nnMCL"); TP53, CDKN2A deletions = high-riskBlastoid/pleomorphic and TP53-mutated = high-risk; ibrutinib, acalabrutinib; intensive chemo + auto-SCT for transplant-eligible; non-SOX11, IGHV-mutated = indolent MCL (watch-and-wait)
Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) — MALT typeHeterogeneous small lymphoid cells in marginal zone distribution; plasma cell differentiation; lymphoepithelial lesions (LELs); reactive folliclesCD20+, CD79a+, BCL2+; CD5−, CD10−, BCL6−, Cyclin D1−; CD21/CD23 highlight expanded marginal zonet(11;18)(q21;q21) → API2-MALT1 (H. pylori−resistant gastric MALT); t(14;18)(q32;q21) → IGH-MALT1; trisomy 3, 18Gastric MALT: H. pylori eradication induces remission in ~75% (t(11;18)-negative cases); non-gastric MALT at various sites; rituximab for H. pylori-negative or refractory
Burkitt lymphoma (BL)Medium-sized cells; round nuclei; multiple nucleoli; abundant basophilic cytoplasm; "starry-sky" macrophages; extremely high mitotic/apoptotic rateCD20+, CD10+, BCL6+, BCL2 negative (critical — BCL2 positivity argues against BL), Ki-67 ~100%, MYC IHC ≥80%MYC rearrangement (t(8;14) in ~80%; t(8;22) or t(2;8) variants); no BCL2 rearrangement; IG-MYC translocation required for definitive diagnosisOncological emergency; rapid doubling time; CNS prophylaxis mandatory; R-CODOX-M/IVAC or DA-EPOCH-R; TLS prevention critical; highly curable (~80–90% long-term survival) in endemic BL
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL)Reed-Sternberg cells (large, bilobed or multinucleated) in mixed inflammatory background; subtypes: NS (most common), MC, LR, LDCD30+++ (membranous/Golgi), CD15+, PAX5 weak/focal, CD20 negative/weak, CD45 (LCA) negative, EBV (LMP1) positive in MC/LD subtypesJAK-STAT pathway alterations; PDL1 amplification on chromosome 9p24.1; clonal IG rearrangements (usually undetectable by PCR)ABVD standard; escalated BEACOPP for high-risk; brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30) + AVD replacing ABVD for advanced-stage; pembrolizumab/nivolumab for relapsed/refractory

DLBCL Cell-of-Origin — Hans Algorithm

The Hans classifier uses three IHC markers to categorise DLBCL into germinal centre B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB (activated B-cell / ABC) subtypes on FFPE tissue — a surrogate for gene expression profiling (GEP). The algorithm:

Clinical relevance: GCB-DLBCL has better prognosis with R-CHOP. Non-GCB (ABC) DLBCL has inferior R-CHOP outcomes; BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib) show preferential activity in ABC-DLBCL due to NF-κB pathway dependence. The ROBUST and PHOENIX trials failed to improve outcomes by adding ibrutinib to R-CHOP for ABC-DLBCL, but next-generation approaches (acalabrutinib + R-CHOP, lenalidomide + R-CHOP) are under investigation.

Major T-cell and NK-cell Lymphoma Entities

LymphomaKey FeaturesIHCGeneticsPrognosis
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS (PTCL-NOS)Heterogeneous; large pleomorphic cells; nodal effacement; prominent vascularity; no specific features of other PTCL types — diagnosis of exclusionCD3+, CD5 often lost, CD4 or CD8; CD30 variable; Ki-67 highHeterogeneous; TET2, DNMT3A, RHOA mutations common; no unifying alteration; GATA3 vs TBX21 GEP subgroupsPoor — 5-yr OS ~30–35%; CHOP-based regimens; brentuximab vedotin + CHP for CD30+ cases; auto-SCT consolidation in CR1
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL)Expanded follicular dendritic cell meshworks (CD21); prominent high endothelial venules; mixed inflammatory background; EBV+ B-cell blasts commonCD3+, CD4+, CD10+, BCL6+, CXCL13+, PD-1+++ (follicular helper T-cell phenotype); CD20+ large B-cells (EBV-driven)TET2+DNMT3A+IDH2 R172 hotspot mutations (~30%) and/or RHOA G17V (~60%); clonal TCR rearrangementPoor — 5-yr OS ~30%; CHOP-based; romidepsin, mogamulizumab; IDH2 mutations → enasidenib under investigation
ALK-positive ALCLLarge pleomorphic cells; hallmark cells (bilobed nuclei, eccentric kidney-shaped nucleus); sinusoidal growth; sheet-like patternCD30+++ (strong uniform), ALK+ (cytoplasmic/nuclear in NPM1-ALK; various patterns with other fusions), CD3 negative or weak, EMA+ALK rearrangements: NPM1-ALK t(2;5) most common (~80%); other fusion partners; clonal TCR rearrangementsBest PTCL prognosis — 5-yr OS ~70–80%; CHOP-based; brentuximab vedotin (BV) + CHP now preferred 1st-line (ECHELON-2)
ALK-negative ALCLIdentical morphology to ALK+ ALCL; same CD30+/ALK− IHC; DUSP22 or TP63 rearrangements by FISH define molecular subsetsCD30+++, ALK−, EMA+; CD3 negative or weakDUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement (~30%, good prognosis); TP63 rearrangement (~8%, poor prognosis); no ALK rearrangementIntermediate — 5-yr OS ~45–60%; depends on FISH subgroup; BV + CHP as per ECHELON-2
Adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATLL)Highly pleomorphic cells; "flower cells" (multi-lobated nuclei) on peripheral blood smear; skin involvement common; hypercalcaemiaCD3+, CD4+, CD25+++ (IL-2R), CD7 often lost, FOXP3+; CCR4+++HTLV-1 proviral integration; TCR clonal rearrangement; CCR4 mutations → mogamulizumab targetDismal — acute type median OS 6–13 months; mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4) approved; allo-SCT only curative option; indolent smouldering type managed conservatively

Flow Cytometry in Lymphoma Diagnosis

Multiparameter flow cytometry (typically 8–10 colour panels) of fresh tissue, peripheral blood, bone marrow, or body fluids provides rapid phenotyping (within hours) and complements FFPE histology. Key advantages over IHC: quantitative antigen expression; light chain restriction (kappa/lambda) for B-cell clonality; simultaneous assessment of 10+ antigens; sensitivity to detect small clonal populations (<1%).

EntityCharacteristic Flow Pattern
CLL/SLLCD5+CD23+CD20(dim)CD79b(dim) B-cells; surface Ig dim; CD38, ZAP-70 as prognostic markers; kappa or lambda restricted
Follicular lymphomaCD10+CD20+BCL2+CD5− B-cells; surface Ig bright; light chain restricted; CD10 expression distinguishes from CLL
Mantle cell lymphomaCD5+CD23−CD20+FMC7+ B-cells; surface Ig bright; CD10−; cyclin D1 (requires intracellular staining); lambda restriction in most
Hairy cell leukaemia (HCL)CD20(bright)+CD22(bright)+CD11c+CD103+CD25+CD123+; BRAF V600E mutation on flow (PCR confirmation); tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining
Plasma cell myelomaCD138+CD38+CD45dim/− B-cells; cytoplasmic Ig restricted (light chain); CD19−CD56+ (abnormal); CD28, CD117 as prognostic markers
T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemiaTdT+CD7+CD3 (cytoplasmic)±; CD4/CD8 double positive or double negative in thymic T-ALL; CD1a+ in cortical type

Leading Haematopathologists — Global 2026

Elias Campo
Lymphoma Classification & WHO 2022
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona / University of Barcelona

Co-editor of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th edition, 2022); world authority on mantle cell lymphoma biology, molecular classification of DLBCL, and the integration of genomics into lymphoma diagnosis. One of the most cited haematopathologists globally.

Steven Swerdlow
WHO Lymphoma Classification
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Co-editor of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (4th and 5th editions). Authority on B-cell lymphomas, plasma cell neoplasms, and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). Instrumental in establishing the integrated diagnostic criteria used worldwide.

Randy Gascoyne
DLBCL Molecular Pathology
BC Cancer / University of British Columbia

Pioneer of gene expression profiling in DLBCL — founding contributor to the GCB/ABC classification and its translation from Lymphochip GEP to clinically applicable IHC algorithms. Expert on BCL2 and MYC in double-hit lymphoma prognosis.

Andreas Rosenwald
Lymphoma Molecular Diagnostics
University of Würzburg

Co-developer of the DLBCL GCB/ABC gene expression classifier; contributor to WHO 2022 lymphoma classification. Expert on primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma molecular biology, and next-generation sequencing diagnostics in lymphoma pathology.

Stefano Pileri
Hodgkin Lymphoma & PTCL
European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan

World authority on Hodgkin lymphoma histology, peripheral T-cell lymphoma classification (AITL, PTCL-NOS, ALCL), and follicular dendritic cell sarcomas. Contributor to all major WHO lymphoma classification editions. Editor of the journal Haematologica.

Laurence de Leval
T-cell Lymphoma & WHO 2022
Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)

Co-editor of WHO 2022 haematolymphoid tumours; world authority on T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas, including AITL, PTCL-NOS molecular subgroups (GATA3 vs TBX21), and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Pioneer in TFH-cell marker IHC and the TFH-origin of nodal T-cell lymphomas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is double-hit lymphoma and why does it change treatment?
Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) — now formally "high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements" (HGBL-MYC/BCL2) in WHO 2022 — is defined by concurrent chromosomal rearrangements of MYC (8q24) and BCL2 (18q21) detected by FISH. The concurrent activation of MYC (proliferation driver) and BCL2 (apoptosis inhibitor) creates a profoundly aggressive biology with very high Ki-67 (usually >90%) and rapid clinical progression. R-CHOP, which achieves high cure rates for standard DLBCL, produces only ~20–25% long-term survival in DHL. Intensified regimens (DA-EPOCH-R, R-CODOX-M/IVAC) with CNS prophylaxis are standard, and CAR-T cell therapy is used early in the relapsed/refractory setting. Pathologists should perform dual MYC+BCL2 FISH on all GCB-DLBCL cases with MYC IHC ≥40%, and on any aggressive B-cell lymphoma with morphological features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma.
How do you distinguish follicular lymphoma from reactive follicular hyperplasia?
Several morphological and immunohistochemical features separate FL from reactive hyperplasia: (1) Architecture — FL shows back-to-back crowded follicles with effacement of the normal nodal sinus architecture, while reactive nodes have follicles separated by generous interfollicular zones; (2) Follicle polarity — reactive germinal centres show well-defined light and dark zones (polarisation); FL germinal centres are monotonous and lack polarity; (3) Tingible body macrophages — abundant in reactive GCs producing a "starry-sky" appearance; absent or rare in FL; (4) BCL2 IHC — reactive germinal centre B-cells are BCL2-negative (BCL2 is suppressed in normal GC reaction); FL cells are BCL2-positive within follicles (a hallmark); (5) CD10 and BCL6 — both positive in FL follicles and in the interfollicular areas (neoplastic cells infiltrate the mantle and interfollicular zones). BCL2 positivity within CD10+ follicular cells is the single most useful diagnostic feature.
Can lymphoma be diagnosed on a core needle biopsy?
Yes — for most lymphoma types, a sufficient core needle biopsy (minimum 18-gauge, 3–5 cores) submitted for FFPE histology, touch imprints, and flow cytometry provides adequate material for diagnosis. Core biopsy is standard for deep nodes (retroperitoneal, mediastinal) and in frail patients. However, excision biopsy remains preferred when: (1) architecture is critical (follicular lymphoma grading requires adequate nodal tissue); (2) hodgkin lymphoma is suspected (Reed-Sternberg cells are rare and may be missed in a small core); (3) primary diagnosis of a lymphoproliferative disorder in a young patient where the full histological picture will guide therapy intensity; (4) T-cell lymphoma subtypes where the zonal architecture pattern (AITL follicular dendritic cell distribution, PTCL-NOS sinusoidal pattern) determines diagnosis. FNA alone is insufficient for a new primary lymphoma diagnosis in virtually all cases.

Related Specialty Guides